MADEKnowledge

MADE Training > Session 2 > Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

Note: This training deck is primarily composed of instructional screenshots (numbered dialog boxes, toolbar callouts, field highlights). The text below preserves all extractable slide text — titles, bullet points, discussion/exercise headings, and table content. Where a slide is dominated by an unlabeled screenshot, only the caption and step-list text could be extracted; screenshot visual detail itself is not represented.

Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

SESSION 2.4 OUTLINE

2.4.1: Functional Failures 2.4.2: Component Failure Diagrams 2.4.3: Failure Diagram Failure Conditions 2.4.4: Part-level Failure Diagrams 2.4.5: System & Subsystem Failure Diagrams 2.4.6: Response Paths 2.4.7: Propagation Table


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

DISCUSSION 2.4 FAILURE ANALYSIS

This session will cover all aspects of how failures are generated in MADE We will cover the difference between functional and physical failures We will use failure diagrams to define more detail of a failure We will generate response paths to look at all of the generated failures by the software We will look at the propagation table for responses generated by the software


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

DISCUSSION 2.4.1 FUNCTIONAL FAILURES

Failures are automatically derived from functions and flows Deviations from the nominal state are considered failures in MADE

   We consider these Functional Failures

Flow typically have two failure responses: High or Low deviation Different domains (flows) have different linguistic terms:

   Flow rate & Contamination use Increase or Decrease
   Flow direction uses Misdirected +/-
   Timing uses Advanced +/Delayed �
   Contamination only has High as a failure response
   Also see: Alignment, Position, Shape, Timing

These failure responses can be managed from the Properties viewer


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.1 FUNCTIONAL FAILURE

To edit a functional failure:

   Open the system model of the `Diesel Engine'
   Select the `Primary Fuel Filter'
   Navigate to the Properties Viewer and select Functional Failures tab
   Tick the Override failure diagram check box
   Disable the High Fuel Flow rate
   This overrides the failure analysis failure paths with the selected functional failure: Low Flow Rate

Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

DISCUSSION 2.4.2 FAILURE DIAGRAMS

Failure diagrams look at the causes & progression of failure

Failure diagrams are focussed on physical aspect of failures

Failure diagrams use a peer-reviewed taxonomy to assist in definition

Taxonomy for failure concepts are shown below

Failure Concept Symbol Definition Cause The abnormal state of input, loading or environment that leads to the degradation of an item.

Mechanism The chemical, electrical, mechanical or software processes which causes physical degradation of a system element and Fault results in a fault. Symptom The physically degraded state of a system element or a change in its behaviour which will result in a failure mode or the inability to carry out its function.

                The response of a failed system element or a loss generated by a failure process that can be used to detect a failure mode.

Failure Conditions A Failure Condition describes the behaviour of a failure mode and its potential effects.

Failure Mode The observable manner in which a system or system element fails to fulfil its function, expressed in terms of the deviation of its output flow from the specified or nominal limits.


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.2 COMPONENT FAILURE DIAGRAMS

To construct a component failure diagram:

Open the system model for the Power Generation' subsystem Right-click the Control Unit' component Select Failure Diagram from right-click menu Select Mechanisms in the Failure Concepts viewer Under Electrical category, click-and-drag Burnout & Dielectric Breakdown mechanisms onto the failure diagram editor


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.2 COMPONENT FAILURE DIAGRAMS (CONTINUED)

You will find that there is a repeat of Over-current and Over-Voltage Causes and Open circuit fault We can simplify the failure diagram by deleting duplicates

  Delete repeated failure concepts: Over-voltage, Over-current and Open circuit

Connect all faults to the Functional failure mode

Note: To select multiple mechanisms, hold Ctrl and select. When multiple mechanisms are selected and placed onto the failure diagram canvas, it will be automatically simplified.


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.2 COMPONENT FAILURE DIAGRAMS (CONTINUED)

Failure diagrams have an underlying taxonomy, however, users may choose to edit the display name to better represent or provide additional information to the failure.

To change the display name of the Transient electrical loads:

Select the Transient electrical loads cause Using the Properties viewer, edit the Name field to: Transient electrical loads due to varying power source


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

DISCUSSION 2.4.3 FAILURE DIAGRAM FAILURE CONDITIONS

Failure condition describes the behaviour of the failure and is connected to the fault. It can be direct or consequential to the failure causing adverse operational conditions.


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.3 FAILURE DIAGRAM FAILURE CONDITIONS

To add a failure condition to the Control Unit failure diagram:

Select the failure condition icon in Failure concepts Select and drag the Intermittent Operation failure concept to the failure diagram Delete the connection between Dielectric strength decreased and the Functional failure mode Connect the Dielectric strength decreased fault to the failure condition Connect the failure condition to the failure mode


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

DISCUSSION 2.4.4 PART-LEVEL FAILURE DIAGRAMS

Part-level failure diagrams capture a more accurate location of failures

Part-failure failure diagrams contain the most amount of detail on a failure

Part-failure diagrams allow for better understanding of failures

   Better informed root cause analysis & diagnosis of failures
   Maintenance actions e.g. repair can be conducted more

     quickly and successfully as the root cause is identified

Part failure diagrams describe how physical failures result in a component's loss of function/s


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.4 PART-LEVEL FAILURE DIAGRAMS

To construct part-level failure diagrams:

Open the system model for the Fuel Tank' Right-click the Inlet' part and select Failure Diagram From the Failure Concepts viewer select the Corrosive attack mechanism and add to the canvas


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.4 PART-LEVEL FAILURE DIAGRAMS (CONTINUED)

Open the system model for the Fuel Tank' Right-click the Lining' part and select Failure Diagram Design the failure diagram as shown below.


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.4 PART-LEVEL FAILURE DIAGRAMS (CONTINUED)

In Project Explorer, right-click the `Fuel Tank' and select Failure Diagram Expand the failure diagram of the Inlet_Lining part-pairs Expand Inlet failure diagram Similarly, expand Lining failure diagram


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.4 PART-LEVEL FAILURE DIAGRAMS (CONTINUED)

Connect the faults in both the Lining' and Inlet' to the part-pair function

Minimise Inlet and Lining


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.4 PART-LEVEL FAILURE DIAGRAMS (CONTINUED)

Connect faults from Lining from Inlet_Outlet to Supply Liquid Static pressure (Linning_Outlet)


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.4 PART-LEVEL FAILURE DIAGRAMS (CONTINUED)

Finally, connect the part-pair functions with the `Fuel Tank' component function


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

DISCUSSION 2.4.5 SYSTEM & SUBSYSTEM FAILURE DIAGRAMS

Systems and Subsystems can have failure diagrams assigned to them The System and Subsystem failure diagrams represent the system and subsystem's failures without knowing

the root causes of failure System and Subsystem failure diagrams should only be used when the root cause component is unknown


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.5 SYSTEM & SUBSYSTEM FAILURE DIAGRAMS

To activate a system or subsystem diagram:

Select Modeling Activate Failure Diagram from the main menu A pop-up dialog will appear listing the System and Subsystems in the model Select the `Power Generation' subsystem check box to activate the failure diagram Confirm selection by selecting


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.5 SYSTEM & SUBSYSTEM FAILURE DIAGRAMS (CONTINUED)

To construct a subsystem diagram:

Right click on the `Driveline' subsystem from the Project Explorer

Select Failure Diagram

A prompt will appear asking to activate failure diagram

Select to activate Subsystem Failure Diagram


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.5 SYSTEM & SUBSYSTEM FAILURE DIAGRAMS (CONTINUED)

Select Mechanisms in the Failure Concepts viewer Select the Impact Fracture mechanism from the Failure Concepts window

   This can be located under the Fracture folder
   Alternatively, use the Search bar and search for Impact Fracture

Drag the failure concept onto the Failure Diagram canvas Connect the Fractured and Cracked faults to both functions


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

DISCUSSION 2.4.6 RESPONSE PATHS

Since MADE is model-based, a list of all failures in the model are generated on-demand

Failures are captured as discrete paths through the system to the End Effect Item

Failure Diagrams split functional failure paths into multiple branches

Failure Pathing can be checked at any time while modeling

We use the Response Paths feature to accomplish this


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.6 RESPONSE PATH

In, Application Preferences Propagation Table Select Yes to Include Failure Conditions in Propagation

Table


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.6 RESPONSE PATHS

To generate response paths in the model:

Right-click `Vehicle System' in the Project Explorer Select: Response Paths FCM In the Response Paths � FCM tab, expand item tree to view all of the model response paths

Note 1: The cause shows the `start' of each path that MADE calculates Note 2: Pathing is used for all FMEA/FMECA analyses


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

DISCUSSION 2.4.7 PROPAGATION TABLE

The Propagation Table shows the flow responses of items (columns) in the system that occur due to each individual functional failure (rows)

Responses are shown in terms of High and Low responses Also shown: % of Detectable Failures, Threshold details


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.7 PROPAGATION TABLE

To generate the Propagation Table:

Select the Propagate All icon from the icon toolbar

Confirm Analysis Type: FCM

Confirm the Response Types: Steady State

Select to expand the side panel to select

the propagation focus

Select to generate the Propagation table


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.7 PROPAGATION TABLE (CONTINUED)


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

EXERCISE 2.4.7 PROPAGATION TABLE (CONTINUED)

The propagation table shows high and low failure responses for each item

   Based on the nominal state of each item

Propagation table can be exported with linguistic or numerical responses


Session 2.4: Failure Analysis

SESSION 2.4 SUMMARY

2.4.1: Functional Failures 2.4.2: Component Failure Diagrams 2.4.3: Failure Diagram Failure Conditions 2.4.4: Part-level Failure Diagrams 2.4.5: System & Subsystem Failure Diagrams 2.4.6: Response Paths 2.4.7: Propagation Table

Source: Local MADE 3.9.1 installation: com.phm.made.help.plugin/documents/help/pdf/MADE Training Session 2.pdf · retrieved 2026-07-09